On March 29, the 12 session of the 22nd meeting of the Standing Committee of Gansu province, according to the agenda of the meeting will consider the Gansu province on population and family planning regulations (Amendment draft).
It is not yet considered, one of the article caused great controversy, is considered to be an incentive to have fewer, with the current population policy: to partly meet the birth two-child policy but give birth two-child family Prize 1000 Yuan.
On March 30, the Gansu health a person Planning Commission policies and regulations in response to the surging News (www.thepaper.CN) says this is not encouraged to have fewer, but "comprehensive two-child" policy gave birth two-child families, the community should continue to enjoy its family planning policy. But finally whether or not to keep the article to consideration by version shall prevail.
According to "daily Gansu network" March 30 message, Gansu province population and family planning Ordinance (Amendment draft) provides, childbearing age couples Department rural residents, meet following conditions one of of, by County Government give 1000 Yuan above one-time award: in full two child policy implementation Qian, only birth a girl, no longer birth of, and has get child card of; meet this Ordinance again birth conditions, in "full two child" policy implementation Qian, voluntary application gave up birth of.
Many experts have expressed doubt.
Demographers Mr he said that although the amount of incentives to give up having a second child is not high, but this is sending a wrong signal to the community and let people believe that fewer children are worth promoting. But in fact, China is now facing a serious situation of less children, aging, "a comprehensive two-child" policy objective is to encourage births, to alleviate the demographic situation.
Population expert Huang wenzhen also believes that rewards give birth two-child contrary to the population policy of the Central Government, China's fertility rate has fallen to a limit, China's 2010 national census data showed the total fertility rate is only 1.18, it should do is to encourage the two-child, reward, rather than incentives give birth the second child.
Mr he said, incentives to give up the second child is "superfluous" because even without incentives to give up two children because of cost or other reasons, many couples are not born two children. He said that almost all the low birth rate in the world's countries and regions are strongly encouraged, but with little success.
On this issue, the surging news connects Gansu province a person Planning Commission policies and regulations, he said, enjoying the reward of 1000 Yuan mainly in two groups, were before January 1, 2016, the national "comprehensive two-child" policy compliant family of birth birth two-child policy but gave up.
These people say, this provision mainly due to two things, one is "comprehensive two-child" policy apply for give birth before the second child, and has achieved one-child certificates family, according to the family planning policy should enjoy 1000 reward.
Another scenario is that "comprehensive two-child" policy has proposed to give up before birth the second child, but has not yet achieved one-child certificates. In order to ensure the coherence of policies should also be in accordance with the law, enjoy the reward of 1000 Yuan, therefore making such a provision. Shanghai announced 20 year development targets
He said, this is not to encourage fewer children, if it is in the year 2016 give birth after the second child will be able to handle one-child certificates, nor enjoy 1000 Yuan reward.
Huang wenzhen said health response planning Commission of Gansu province have a point, but even if it is for policy continuity should also be emphasized, avoid using the word reward, which run counter to the spirit of the new law. "Before advocating one reward only children, have advocated a second child, should it not also award two children." He said.
Surging news understands that the draft amendments today (March 30) are meeting tomorrow to be considered. The official said, whether this article is ultimately adopted, subject to the deliberations.
No comments:
Post a Comment